For a comedy, She Stoops to Conquer has a serious vein of commentary of class.
She Stoops to Conquer: Comedy with a Serious Commentary on Class.
Oliver Goldsmith’s 'She Stoops to Conquer* is celebrated as a classic comedy of manners, full of witty dialogue, mistaken identities, and farcical situations. However, beneath the laughter lies a sharp critique of the rigid social hierarchy of 18th-century England. Goldsmith uses humor not just to entertain but to question the class distinctions and social pretensions of his time.
1. The Irony of Class-Based Assumptions.
One of the central comedic devices in the play is mistaken identity, which Goldsmith uses to highlight the absurdity of class assumptions.
- "Marlow’s Mistake:" Marlow believes Mr. Hardcastle is an innkeeper, not a gentleman. This mistake allows Goldsmith to satirize how the upper class treats those they believe to be below them.
- "Double Standard in Behavior:" Marlow is shy and respectful with upper-class women but lewd and casual with lower-class women. This duality underscores the hypocrisy in the class-based moral standards of the time.
2. Kate’s “Stoop” as Social Commentary.
Kate Hardcastle's decision to "stoop" to the level of a barmaid is a pivotal moment in the play.
- "Agency through Disguise:" By pretending to be of a lower class, Kate takes control of her relationship with Marlow and subverts the traditional power dynamic.
- "Critique of Social Barriers:" Her disguise questions the validity of rigid social roles. It suggests that genuine human connection can transcend class boundaries—if people are willing to look past appearances.
3. The Ridicule of Pretentiousness and Social Climbing.
Characters like Mrs. Hardcastle and Tony Lumpkin are used to lampoon social pretensions.
- "Mrs. Hardcastle’s Aspirations:" Her obsession with marrying her son into wealth and status mocks the obsession with social mobility through material means.
- "Tony’s Rejection of Inheritance:" Tony’s refusal to be forced into a socially advantageous marriage satirizes the idea that class advancement should come at the cost of personal freedom.
4. Hospitality vs. Hierarchy.
Mr. Hardcastle’s genuine hospitality is contrasted with Marlow’s condescending behavior when he mistakes him for an innkeeper.
- "Old Money vs. New Attitudes:" Hardcastle represents the old-fashioned gentry who value honor and tradition, while Marlow reflects the new class of aristocrats, increasingly snobbish and shallow.
- "Inversion of Social Order:" The domestic setting becomes a stage where class roles are blurred, forcing characters (and audiences) to rethink their biases.
5. Marriages as a Mirror of Class Expectations.
The romantic entanglements in the play reflect the broader societal expectations around class and marriage.
- "Arranged vs. Chosen Marriage:" The play contrasts the traditional practice of arranged marriages for social gain with marriages based on love and personal compatibility.
- "Breaking Norms:" The eventual pairing of Marlow and Kate—and of Tony and his true love, Bet Bouncer—challenges the classist logic of marrying "well" for status.
6. Goldsmith’s Purpose: Laughing to Reflect.
Goldsmith intentionally avoided the sentimental comedy that was popular in his time, choosing instead to return to the robust humor of Restoration comedy with a moral edge.
- "Comedy as Critique:" By making audiences laugh at the absurdities of class obsession, Goldsmith encourages reflection and, possibly, change.
- "Humanizing All Classes:" Through clever role reversals and character development, he shows that dignity, intelligence, and virtue are not limited to the upper class.
Conclusion: A Play that Stoops to Conquer Classism.
'She Stoops to Conquer' remains a delightful comedy, but its lasting impact comes from how it uses humor to shine a light on class prejudices. Goldsmith doesn't preach—he plays. But within that play, he invites the audience to question who truly has the upper hand: those born into privilege, or those clever enough to “stoop” and outwit the system?
Comments
Post a Comment